|
GeSp819 ********************************* Number: 819 Name: HIGH SUBURBIA COMMUTE:1 Address: J.E.D.CLINE1 Date: 890414 Approximate # of bytes: 12600 Number of Accesses: 16 Library: 3 Description: Subject index and more thoughts on KESTS (Kinetic Energy Supported Transportation Structures) directly connecting Earth surface with an Earth-circling ring of rotating space settlements (each similar to Stanford Torus design), filling Geosynchronous Earth Orbit. Keywords: KESTS, GEO, settlements, Torus, transportation,beanstalks,elevators --------------------------------- The Commute to High Suburbia, pt. 1 April 14, 1989 by J. E. D. Cline More thoughts on Kinetic-energy-supported transportation structures directly connecting earth surface with an earth-circling ring of rotating space settlements filling geosynchronous earth orbit. And an index of subjects. *** THE BIG PICTURE, AS SEEN FROM DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS: ** From the viewpoint of extending human nature's urge to expand into new territory, transforming the materials found there into comfortable shelter, good food, family support, and interesting activities. ** From the viewpoint of a continually advancing civilization. ** From the viewpoint of high standard of living for all. **From the viewpoint of restoring the Earth's ecosystem. ** From the viewpoint of preserving a maximum of genotypes. ** From the viewpoint of worldwide harmonious constructive co-operation, instead of conflict over possession of dwindling resources of energy, materials, room and food. ** From the viewpoint of generally stopping change while you're on top, to minimize stress and keep the good life. ** From the viewpoint of generally promoting changes that could improve the quality of your life, and provide interesting stimulation. ** From the viewpoint of childhood fables, uneasy feelings, and of hilarious analogies, that make it easy to think about. *** PIECES OF THE BIG PICTURE: ** KESTS: Kinetic-Energy-Supported Transportation Structures. ** Principles of kinetic-energy-supported transportation structures. ** Different forms of kinetic-energy-supported transportation structures. ** Prieviously-proposed kinetic-energy-supported transportation structures. ** Energy storage in KESTS. ** Tranmission of energy over a KESTS. ** Transmission of surplus energy to the Earth-surface electric power grid via the kinetic-energy-mass-stream of a KESTS. ** Energy calculations of potential energy change while lifting payload into space. ** Possible use of KESTS on Earth' surface, for bridges, transportation of raw material, and a ground commuter system. ** Power from satellite solar power stations, to run the KESTS, power for the the GEO Habitat Ring, and power for Earth-surface electrical power system. ** Geosynchronous earth orbit habitat ring. ** The Stanford Torus: a possible basic segment of High Suburbia, room for 1,500,000 of them in the first GEO Habitat Ring. ** Transportation system for construction materials from the Lunar surface to the GEO Habitat Ring ** Contributors to KESTS, and their contributions, so far. * Energy calculations of potential energy change while lifting payload into space: To quote a classic by Arthur C. Clarke, "The Exploration of Space" (1951), p. 33:" When one calculates the amount of work that has to be done in lifting a body from the surface of the Earth to a point so distant that gravity is negligible, one obtains a surprisingly simple result. The work involved is exactly the same as that needed to climb vertically through a distance equal to the radius of the Earth--say 4,000 miles--in a steady gravity field, if 'g' remained constant at its sea-level value." And since the work done while raising an object from one place to another higher position is simply the product of the object's weight times the height change, a one pound weight moved to this far place would be: work = W X h = 1 lbf * 4000 mi * 5280 ft/mi work = E = 1*4000*5280 = 2.1E7 ft lbf work = 2.1E7*3.77E-7 kw hr work = energy = 7.9 kw hr per pound. Thus the energy required to lift a pound of payload from Earth surface to an infinitely far place is only about 8 kw hr, the same as you use to run a 1 kw electric room heater for 8 hours. The work, or energy, required to lift a pound from Earth-surface just to GEO is less than this. How much do you pay per kw hr on your electric bill? * FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CHILDHOOD FABLES, UNEASY FEELINGS, AND HILARIOUS ANALOGIES, MAKING IT EASY TO THINK ABOUT: The concept of kinetic-energy-supported structures are so strange that even many people devoted to creating a spacefaring civilization are either outraged or overcome with laughter at it. It IS an outrageous idea, we all know that. Reminds us of Jack and the Beanstalk fairy tale...Jack with his axe chopped it down. Also reminds us of the biblical Tower of Babel, where it is said the ancient Babylonians tried to build a ziggurat tower so high that it would enable man to enter the 'heavens.' Failed because the construction workers couldn't all speak the same language, and communication problems ended the project in babel, so it is said. Strength of materials limitations also cancelled the Russian Artsutanov'v concept to build a tower on earth so tall that it went out past GEO, and was supported by the centrifugal force as it rotated around with the earth...even pure diamond isn't strong enough to support its own weight, however. Space elevators?? That reminds us of flying saucers and teleportation, right? Riding elevators in buildings makes us feel uneasy, stomach queasy, all crammed in there with a crowd and hoping it doesn't break and go crashing down to the bottom. A space elevator supported by energy would be too unstable. Why live in space, anyway? Living in space is like living in a submarine, and everything is too light and floats away.... However, KESTS is not truely an entirely new concept, for nature has been doing it for eons. The next time you see a water fountain in action, squirt water out of a hose, or absorb the beauty of a waterfall, you are seeing a kinetic-energy supported stream. To make it into a structure, imagine the fast jet of water supporting a tube which it flows through, a tube which in turn has moving objects moving along it, and you have a picture of a kinetic-energy-supported transportation structure. So it is neither new nor entirely novel. It is helpful to contemplate amusing thoughts of squirting water streams, beanstalks into the sky, Jack with his axe and urge to grab gold from beyond the earth, for they provide a framework to think of things perhaps never really thought about before. After we sober up after such hilarity, we can perhaps start seriously envisioning kinetic-energy-supported transportation systems linking every nation to sections of an earth-circling ring of Stanford-Torus space settlements filling geosynchronous Earth orbit...the Clarke Belt...providing suburb-like habitation for at least 15 billion people with the agriculture to sustain them there. Perhaps these childhood thoughts, stirring around in the subconscious for decades, and linking up with contemporary technology, have found something that can truly provide masive space colonization, and in our time if humanity really decided to go for it in a big way. A lot of development and engineering would be required, yet no new fundamental discoveries need be made, to produce kinetic-energy-supported transportation structures. For example, high-temperature superconcuctors would be helpful for some aspects of the concept, but are not really necessary. Because the kinetic energy of the high velocity stream can be tapped not only to support a fixed outer shell, but also deliver power to lift vehicles travelling along its outside, it could resemble a mixture of elevator and electric streetcar crossing a bridge. And some of the mass of the actual stream can be payload itself, forming a simple delivery system of immense amounts of material. Since the transportation concept does not need to await any scientific discoveries, but just the creation and development of a new technology based on rather well-known basic principles, the rate at which this can be accomplished is more a function of how much of our time and effort we are willing to put into it. A small corporation could tinker around with it for decades. Or a worldwide top priority effort could probably have most nations linked to GEO within ten years, and start building space habitats there for tens of thousands of people per month each, in another ten years. And ten more years would see a high capacity transportation link to lunar raw materials for building habitats at GEO, and automated basic shell construction equipment, building High Suburbia at the rate of tens of millions of dwellings/life support per year, and more. Thirty years from now most of humanity could be living in High Suburbia, and the restoration of Earth surface ecosystems could be strongly ongoing. With a massive effort worldwide, that is! Or with no effort, we can continue down the path we are on right now, with its projected exhaustion of some natural resources, vast mountain ranges built of disposed garbage, tyrannical birth control measures, and extinction of most of the kinds of other living creatures with which we have always shared this planet. Maybe these happenings even accellerated by warfare using nerve gasses, poisons, nuclear radiation and blast, deliberate spread of diseases...who knows what the mind of man would be put to do, if blocked from its natural creatively constructive expansion nature? Since in recent decades America has changed from mostly middle class to shift the vast majority of wealth into the hands of a very few people, the possibility exists that the ultra-rich & powerful (consider money as a form of energy, in a sense, for it can ""do work", which is the criteria for energy) will either see KESTS/ high Suburbia as a threat upsetting their successful activities; or else some of them may see KESTS as a way to vast riches beyond any imagining now. If established as a real estate project, selling real estate for billions of people means big bucks even if the average income to pay for the dwellings is relatively low. For example, say only one billion of "excess" population went to live in High Suburbia over the next 30 years, and their average ability to pay would be only $1,000 down payment, with another $10,000 to be paid after being established there: that means an initial 1 trillion dollars, with $10 trillion more to come. Most of High Suburbia would be built out of lunar materials by a large robot processing, manufacturing and assembly facility that largely automatically adds onto the habitat ring in GEO, requiring only high-tech instrumentation and maintenance and certain raw materials from Earth surface (or eventually the asteroids and moons of the outer planets), thus requiring relatively little capital investment from the Earth once it is going. Another liklyhood is that Japan will build the first KESTS, because they have a high population, small land living area, high-technology capability, and the wisdom of a culture that teaches both sides of the brain, even has a written language for each side of the brain. Thus they inherently are better able to balance linear thinking with big-picture thinking, at every level in their culture. Seeing both the forest and the trees, so to speak. Japan is far more likely to see the tremendous value of High Suburbia & KESTS than people in countries where only linear thinking is taught in schools, such as here in America currently. It would be much better to create High Suburbia/KESTS as a project including every interested nation, with equal rights to portions of the GEO Habitat Ring; each nation would have one or more KESTS from their land to their sections of the GEO Habitat Ring, High Suburbia. I would like feedback from all readers, feedback of any kind (written feedback, that is. Please, no hit squads!) I have some sketches that might help visualize KESTS and High Suburbia, if people would like them. Send request/feedback via GEnie mail, or write directly to: J. E. D. Cline 5632 Van Nuys Blvd, #110 Van Nuys, CA 91401 An Excalator Hi page titled GeSp819 by J E D Cline started on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 5:10:53 PM US/Pacific Copyright © 2008 James E. D. Cline. Permission granted to reproduce providing inclusion of a link back to this site and acknowledgment of the author and concept designer James E. D. Cline. |
Links
Categories
|